Table 2.
Distribution of LDC across visits and subjects
| Number of loci (%)
|
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Test 1
|
Test 2
|
Test 3
|
|||||||
| DS | RS | NS | DS | RS | NS | DS | RS | NS | |
| Subject 1 | 0 (0%) | 2 (3%) | 66 (97%) | 0 (0%) | 9 (13%) | 59 (87%) | 0 (0%) | 14 (21%) | 54 (79%) |
| Subject 2 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 68 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 68 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (4%) | 65 (96%) |
| Subject 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 68 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 15 (22%) | 53 (78%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (3%) | 66 (97%) |
| Subject 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 68 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 6 (9%) | 62 (91%) | 0 (0%) | 5 (7%) | 63 (93%) |
| Subject 5 | 0 (0%) | 4 (6%) | 64 (94%) | 0 (0%) | 10 (15%) | 58 (85%) | 0 (0%) | 8 (12%) | 60 (88%) |
| Subject 6 | 13 (19%) | 17 (25%) | 38 (56%) | 13 (19%) | 17 (25%) | 38 (56%) | 13 (19%) | 19 (28%) | 36 (53%) |
| Subject 7 | 3 (4%) | 17 (25%) | 48 (71%) | 5 (7%) | 26 (38%) | 37 (54%) | 5 (7%) | 34 (50%) | 29 (43%) |
| Subject 8 | 30 (44%) | 13 (19%) | 25 (37%) | 31 (46%) | 16 (23%) | 21 (31%) | 3 (4%) | 17 (25%) | 48 (70%) |
| Subject 9 | 3 (4%) | 18 (27%) | 47 (69%) | 3 (4%) | 17 (25%) | 48 (71%) | 3 (4%) | 24 (35%) | 41 (60%) |
| Subject 10a | 46 (68%) | 16 (24%) | 3 (4%) | 47 (69%) | 15 (22%) | 3 (4%) | 47 (69%) | 15 (22%) | 3 (4%) |
| Subject 11a | 32 (47%) | 35 (51%) | 0 (0%) | 34 (50%) | 33 (49%) | 0 (0%) | 35 (51%) | 32 (47%) | 0 (0%) |
| Subject 12 | 24 (35%) | 34 (50%) | 10 (15%) | 38 (56%) | 26 (38%) | 4 (6%) | 35 (51%) | 25 (37%) | 8 (12%) |
| Subject 13 | 19 (28%) | 37 (54%) | 12 (18%) | 21 (31%) | 30 (44%) | 17 (25%) | 20 (29%) | 36 (53%) | 12 (18%) |
| Subject 14 | 0 (0%) | 13 (19%) | 55 (81%) | 0 (0%) | 34 (50%) | 34 (50%) | 0 (0%) | 41 (60%) | 27 (40%) |
| Subject 15 | 0 (0%) | 24 (35%) | 44 (65%) | 0 (0%) | 24 (35%) | 44 (65%) | 0 (0%) | 20 (29%) | 48 (71%) |
| Subject 16 | 10 (15%) | 49 (72%) | 9 (13%) | 20 (29%) | 45 (66%) | 3 (4%) | 19 (28%) | 47 (69%) | 2 (3%) |
| Total | 180 (16%) | 279 (26%) | 625 (58%) | 212 (19%) | 323 (30%) | 549 (51%) | 207 (19%) | 335 (31%) | 542 (50%) |
| Mean number of loci | 11 | 18 | 39 | 13 | 20 | 35 | 13 | 21 | 34 |
Note:
a
Subject did not have all 68 loci analyzed due to stimulus not being projected or unavailable local defect classification.
Abbreviations: LDC, local defect classification; DS, dense scotoma; RS, relative scotoma; NS, normal-suspect.