Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 9;6(28):24871–24883. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.4549

Table 2. Multivariate analysis of clinicopathological factors for PFS and OS in patients with WHO II and III diffuse gliomas who received adjuvant therapies (Group A, n = 246) and those who did not (Group B, n = 49) after surgery.

Adjuvant therapies Variables PFS OS
HR(95%CI) p-value HR(95%CI) p-value
RT and/or CHT Age 1.016(1.000–1.033) 0.054 1.020(1.002–1.039) 0.031
WHO grade (Grade II vs III) 2.263(1.474–3.475) <0.001 2.573(1.610–4.110) <0.001
Complete resection (Yes vs. No) 2.645(1.794–3.899) <0.001 2.116(1.389–3.223) <0.001
IDH mutation (Yes vs. No) 2.424(1.524–3.854) <0.001 2.652(1.632–4.308) <0.001
1p/19q codeletion (Yes vs. No) 1.736(0.996–3.027) 0.052 1.834(0.978–3.439) 0.059
TERT promoter mutation(Yes vs. No) 1.043(0.659–1.650) 0.858 1.128(0.690–1.844) 0.632
No RT or CHT Age 1.038(1.009–1.069) 0.011 1.037(1.004–1.070) 0.026
WHO grade (Grade II vs III) 11.330(3.770–34.048) <0.001 7.001(2.167–22.615) 0.001
Complete resection (Yes vs. No) 1.528(0.665–3.508) 0.318 1.705(0.747–3.892) 0.205
IDH mutation (Yes vs. No) 0.707(0.295–1.694) 0.436 0.751(0.314–1.795) 0.519
1p/19q codeletion (Yes vs. No) 0.936(0.302–2.898) 0.908 1.738(0.510–5.923) 0.377
TERT promoter mutation(Yes vs. No) 1.832(0.704–4.765) 0.215 1.665(0.635–4.366) 0.300

p values in bold were considered statistically significant

HR: hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval; RT: radiation therapy; CHT: chemotherapy.