Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 27;6(29):26886–26894. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.4723

Table 3. Concordance between Idylla and other methods in detecting BRAF V600 mutations in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue samples.

Concordance between cobas and Idylla testing of FFPE tumor tissue samples (N = 58)
BRAF mutation (cobas) BRAF wild-type (cobas)
BRAF mutation (Idylla) 13 2
BRAF wild-type (Idylla) 0 43
Observed agreements 56 (97%); kappa, 0.91, SE, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.78–1.00
Concordance between MiSeq and Idylla testing of FFPE tumor tissue samples (N = 58)
BRAF mutation (MiSeq) BRAF wild-type (MiSeq)
BRAF mutation (Idylla) 15 0
BRAF wild-type (Idylla) 0 43
Observed agreements 58 (100%); kappa, 1.00, SE, 0.00; 95% CI, 1.00–1.00
Concordance between laboratory and Idylla testing of FFPE tumor tissue samples (N = 100)
BRAF mutation (CLIA) BRAF wild-type (CLIA)
BRAF mutation (Idylla) 61 1
BRAF wild-type (Idylla) 3 35
Observed agreements 96 (96%); kappa, 0.91, SE, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.83–1.00
Sensitivity 95% (95% CI, 0.87–0.99)
Specificity 97% (95% CI, 0.85–1.00)
Positive predictive value 98% (95% CI, 0.91–1.00)
Negative predictive value 92% (95% CI, 0.79–0.98)

Abbreviations: SE, standard error; CI, confidence interval.