Table 2.

Selected Previously Reported Retinal Detachment Rates Following Macular Hole Surgery

Authors	Year	Vitrectomy Technique	N (eyes)	Follow-up time (months)	RDa rate
Park et al.22	1995	ERMb removal	98	11 (mean)	14%
Banker et al.18	1997	No ILMc peeling	95	12	11%
Tabandeh et al.19	1999	ERM peeling; No ILM peeling	438	30 (mean)	1.8%
Brooks HL, Jr.9	2000	ILM peeling No ILM peeling	116 44	44.5 (mean)	2.7% 4.5%
Haritoglou et al.10	2002	ILM peeling	99	32 (mean)	2%
Ezra et al.23	2004	ERM peeling; non-ILM peeling	124	24	5.6%
Kwok et al.13	2005	ILM peeling No ILM peeling	26 25	12 (mean)	7.7% 4%
Tognetto et al.8	2006	ILM peeling No ILM peeling	1100 527	15 (median)	2.3% 2.9%
Guillaubey et al.12	2007	ILM peeling	272	28 (mean)	6.6%
Patelli et al.20	2007	ILM peeling	24	10 (mean)	16.6%
Christenen14	2009	ILM peeling Non-ILM peeling	54 25	12	2.2%
Rizzo et al.17	2010	ILM peeling in all cases 20 gauge 23/25 sutureless	301 656	6	1.2% 1.7%
Passemard et al.16	2010	ILM peeling	135	37 (mean)	7.4%
Lois et al.15	2011	ILM peeling Non-ILM peeling	64 62	6	5% 3%
Sakaguchi et al.7	2012	No ILM peeling	23	83.4 (mean)	0%
Wu and Kung21	2012	ILM peeling	High myopia:8 Non-high myopia:34	7.0 (mean) 8.12 (mean)	12.5% 0%
Jackson et al.3	2013	ILM peeling Non-ILM peeling	1014 64	Unspecified	2.4% (RD surgery)

^aRD= Retinal detachment;

^bERM= Epiretinal membrane;

^cILM= Internal limiting membrane