. 2015 Dec 30;7:119. doi: 10.1186/s13098-015-0115-3

Table 4.

Comparison of complications presence in patients with type 2 DM

		Controls n (%)	DM with poor control n (%)	DM with good control n (%)	Exact p
Sex	Male	8 (25.8)	21 (52.5)	11 (36.7)	>0.05^a
Sex	Female	23 (74.2)	19 (47.5)	19 (63.3)	>0.05^a
Neuropathy	No		20 (50)	23 (76.7)	<0.001^a
Neuropathy	Yes		20 (50)	7 (23.3)	<0.001^a
CAD	No		32 (80)	28 (93.3)	<0.001^a
CAD	Yes		8 (20)	2 (6.7)	<0.001^a
Retinopathy	No		31 (77.5)	28 (93.3)	<0.001^a
Retinopathy	Yes		9 (22.5)	2 (6.7)	<0.001^a
PAH	No		38 (95)	29 (96.7)	<0.001^a
PAH	Yes		2 (5)	1 (3.3)	<0.001^a
Diabetic foot	No		38 (95)	30 (100)	>0.05^a
Diabetic foot	Yes		2 (5)	0 (0)	>0.05^a

Fisher test were used in analyzing categorical variables and descriptive statistics were expressed as frequency (%)

^aIt was used the Chi square test for statistical analysis