Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 7;27(1):281–292. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2015010062

Table 2.

Hazard ratio (multivariate models) for graft failure according to renal allograft histology, renal function, and proteinuria at time of biopsy, adjusted for donor age and time after transplantation in Cohort 1 (n=1335 indication biopsies)

Parameter Adjusted Hazard Ratio (95% CI) P Value
Model 1: Without proteinuria
 eGFR at time of biopsy 30–45 versus >45 mL/min per m2 1.48 (0.50–4.40) 0.48
15–30 versus >45 mL/min per m2 4.21 (1.53–11.6) <0.01
<15 versus >45 mL/min per m2 9.41 (3.37–26.3) <0.001
 Microcirculation inflammation g+ptc ≥2 versus <2 1.45 (1.03–2.04) 0.03
 IF/TA grade Banff grade 1 versus 0 1.72 (1.19–2.50) 0.004
Banff grade 2–3 versus 0 3.44 (2.34–5.05) <0.001
 Transplant glomerulopathy Banff grade 1 versus 0 1.24 (0.69–2.22) 0.48
Banff grade 2–3 versus 0 2.54 (1.54–4.18) <0.001
 De novo/recurrent glomerular disease Present versus absent 1.59 (0.99–2.56) 0.06
 Polyomavirus associated nephropathy Present versus absent 5.84 (3.22–10.6) <0.001
Model 2: With proteinuria
 Proteinuria at time of biopsy 0.3–1.0 versus <0.3 g/24 h 1.14 (0.81–1.60) 0.50
1.0–3.0 versus <0.3 g/24 h 2.17 (1.49–3.18) <0.001
>3.0 versus <0.3 g/24 h 3.01 (1.75–5.18) <0.001
 eGFR at time of biopsy 30–45 versus >45 mL/min per m2 1.76 (0.59–5.30) 0.31
15–30 versus >45 mL/min per m2 5.53 (1.99–15.4) 0.001
<15 versus >45 mL/min per m2 11.7 (4.17–33.0) <0.001
 Microcirculation inflammation g+ptc ≥2 versus <2 1.36 (0.97–1.91) 0.07
 IF/TA grade Banff grade 1 versus 0 1.82 (1.25–2.64) 0.002
Banff grade 2–3 versus 0 3.45 (2.34–5.07) <0.001
 Transplant glomerulopathy Banff grade 1 versus 0 1.00 (0.55–1.82) 0.99
Banff grade 2–3 versus 0 1.83 (1.11–3.04) 0.02
 De novo/recurrent glomerular disease Present versus absent 1.35 (0.84–2.19) 0.22
 Polyomavirus associated nephropathy Present versus absent 5.51 (3.06–9.92) <0.001

g, glomerulitis; ptc, peritubular capillaritis; IF/TA, interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy.