Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 30;10(12):e0145258. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145258

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the patient populations.

LTS (n = 67) CAD (n = 52) ES (n = 28) ESRD (n = 45) HC (n = 26)
Age (year) 55.2±9.7 48.3±8.6 41.2±10.3 44.7±10.5 35.5±9.3
Male, n (%) 38 (57) 25 (48) 16 (57) 29 (64) 8 (30.8)
Post-transplant year 17.1±4.9*, 9.2±4.3 # 0.4±01 - -
HLA mismatch 3.1±1.4 3.3±1.5 3.1±1.9 - -
Donor (LD / DD), n (%) 61 / 6 (91 / 9)* 31 / 21 (60 / 40) 28 / 0 (100 / 0) - -
Immune suppressant regimen *,
Tac based triple therapy 2 (3) 19 (38) 21 (75) - -
CsA based triple therapy 17 (25) 13 (26) 5 (18) - -
Tac based dual therapy 5 (8) 1 (2) 0 (0) - -
CsA based dual therapy 4 (6) 0 (0) 0 (0) - -
AZA+steroid 5 (8) 1 (2) 0 (0) - -
Tac monotherapy (±steroid) 3 (5) 9 (18) 2 (7) - -
CsA monotherapy (±steroid) 31 (46) 7 (14) 0 (0) - -

ADPKD, autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease; AZA, azathioprine; CAD, chronic allograft dysfunction; CsA, cyclosporine; DD, deceased donor; DM, diabetes mellitus; ES, early stable; ESRD, end stage renal disease; GN, glomerulonephritis; HC, healthy control; LD, living donor; LTS, long term stable; MIZ, miroribine; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; Tac, Tacrolimus; SRL, sirolimus

Tac (or CsA) based triple therapy included Tac (or CsA)+MMF+Steroid or Tac (or CsA)+MIZ+Steroid or Tac (or CsA)+SRL+Steroid

Tac (or CsA) based dual therapy included Tac (or CsA) +AZA, Tac (or CsA) +MMF, Tac (or CsA) +MIZ

* P<0.05 vs. CAD

P<0.05 vs. ES

# P<0.05 vs. LTS