Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pharmacotherapy. 2015 Mar 10;35(4):361–369. doi: 10.1002/phar.1560

Table 2.

Summary of Midazolam and 1′-hydroxymidazolam Pharmacokinetics Before and After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (mean ± SD)

Baseline (n=9) 3 mo (n=9) 12 mo (n=9)
Midazolam
 Cmax, ng/ml 9.67 ± 6.72 16.09 ± 6.65a 16.56 ± 7.55a
 Tmax, hr 0.61 ± 0.22 0.28 ± 0.08a 0.26 ± 0.08a
 Vd/F, L 763 ± 254 553 ± 219a 506 ± 260a
 Cl/F, L/hr 91.9 ± 74.4 100.6 ± 58.6 100.1 ± 40.2
 t1/2, hr 8.0 ± 3.7 5.3 ± 3.7 4.5 ± 4.3
 AUC0–last, ng·hr/ml 20.8 ± 10.7 20.3 ± 10.8 18.3 ± 7.9
 AUC0–∞, ng·hr/ml 31.2 ± 15.7 26.8 ± 14.7 23.8 ± 11.2
1′-Hydroxymidazolam
 Cmax, ng/ml 3.19 ± 2.01 5.97 ± 2.11a 5.75 ± 2.00a
 Tmax, hr 0.69 ± 0.29 0.35 ± 0.10a 0.31 ± 0.05a
 t1/2, hr 3.3 ± 1.3 2.5 ± 1.2 2.1 ± 1.3
 AUC0–last, ng·hr/ml 6.5 ± 3.9 8.1 ± 3.4 7.1 ± 1.9
 AUC0–∞, ng·hr/ml 8.5 ± 4.2 9.8 ± 3.9 8.2 ± 2.0
1′OH MDZ:MDZ AUC ratio 0.35 ± 0.27 0.47 ± 0.28 0.40 ± 0.14

AUC = area under the concentration-time curve; Cl/F = oral clearance; Cmax = peak plasma concentration; t1/2 = serum half-life; Tmax = time to peak plasma concentration; Vd/F = apparent volume of distribution.

a

p<0.05 compared with baseline.