Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 10;46(3):493–504. doi: 10.1017/S0033291715001877

Table 1.

Cognitive performance and event-related potential measures from the cued continuous performance test: means, effect sizes and significance of group comparisons

ADHD (n = 20) a : mean (s.d.) b BD (n = 20): mean (s.d.) b Controls (n = 20): mean (s.d.) b ADHD v. BD, effect size: d ADHD v. controls, effect size: d BD v. controls, effect size: d
MRT, ms 425.31 (75.74) 418.30 (67.41) 391.58 (63.68) 0.05 0.49 d 0.44
RTV, ms 109.18 (58.83) 101.73 (37.77) 76.91 (39.24) 0.02 0.60 d 0.68 d *
OE 1.10 (1.55) 1.35 (2.52) 0.60 (1.57) 0.12 0.32* 0.36†
OXO-not-XOX CE 1.05 (1.88) 0.60 (2.04) 0.50 (0.89) 0.23 0.37 0.06
Total CE 7.25 (16.03) 2.40 (5.39) 0.75 (0.97) 0.41 0.57 d * 0.43
Cue-P3 at Pz 2.30 (1.64) 1.36 (1.80) 1.83 (2.04) 0.56 d 0.26 0.25
CNV at Cz −2.24 (1.03) −2.31 (1.36) −3.31 (2.12) 0.06 0.66 d * 0.58 d
NoGo-N2 at Fz 0.57 (1.88) 2.41 (2.64) 0.84 (2.07) 0.83 c * 0.14 0.68 d *
NoGo-P3 at Cz 5.42 (2.73) 5.56 (3.31) 7.68 (2.57) 0.05 0.88 c * 0.73 d *
Go-P3 at CPz 5.01 (2.76) 5.56 (3.23) 6.10 (2.18) 0.19 0.45 d 0.20

ADHD, Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; s.d., standard deviation; BD, bipolar disorder; MRT, mean reaction time; RTV, within-subject variability in reaction times; OE, omission errors; CE, commission errors; CNV, contingent negative variation.

a

Only 18 participants with ADHD were included in the average of the Go condition, as two participants did not have at least 20 artefact-free segments.

b

Means and s.d.s were calculated on raw data.

c

Large effect size.

d

Medium effect size.

* p < 0.05, † p < 0.10.