Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 31.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Health Med. 2014 Jul 24;20(3):332–344. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2014.940354

Table 3.

Odds ratios (95% CI) for loneliness according to available social support

n % lonely Adjusted for demographicsa Adjusted for demographics and other factorsb

Sometimes Often/always Sometimes Often/always Sometimes Often/always
Available practical support:
More than two people 1,623 20.8 12.9 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
One or two people 1,730 25.2 16.4 1.37 (1.15, 1.63) 1.38 (1.12, 1.70) 1.34 (1.05, 1.71) 1.14 (0.85, 1.52)
None 729 27.6 20.2 1.81 (1.45, 2.26) 2.10 (1.62, 2.71) 1.64 (1.20, 2.24) 1.54 (1.07, 2.22)
P (trend) <0.001 0.002
Available financial support:
More than two people 1,052 20.2 12.6 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
One or two people 1,178 23.7 17.0 1.29 (1.04, 1.60) 1.49 (1.15, 1.91) 1.09 (0.82, 1.44) 1.17 (0.83, 1.64)
None 1,852 26.1 16.5 1.50 (1.23, 1.82) 1.46 (1.15, 1.86) 1.18 (0.92, 1.51) 0.93 (0.68, 1.27)
P (trend) <0.001 0.15
Available emotional support:
More than two people 1,696 21.9 12.4 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
One or two people 1,602 24.8 16.6 1.25 (1.05, 1.48) 1.42 (1.15, 1.76) 0.95 (0.74, 1.23) 1.20 (0.88, 1.63)
None 784 26.2 20.8 1.54 (1.24, 1.91) 2.10 (1.64, 2.69) 1.01 (0.74, 1.37) 1.68 (1.17, 2.42)
P (trend) <0.001 0.01
a

Sex, age, household type, employment, education, long-standing illness and migrant status;

b

Impact of each social support factor adjusted for demographics and all other social support factors