Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015 Oct 30;158:30–37. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.10.024

Figure 2a-c. Level-one interactions predicting log odds of temptation vs. abstinence.

Figure 2a-c

Interaction effects of urge x agitation, urge x cigarette exposure, and positive affect x impulsiveness on the log odds of experiencing a temptation. To plot these effects for the continuously scaled constructs, log odds were calculated from low (1 SD below mean), mid (mean), and high (1 SD above mean) range values. Impulsiveness values reflect square-root percent commission errors on a momentary behavioral disinhibition task. Log odds can be exponentiated to derive odds ratios of experiencing a temptation (ex). Figure Legend: 2a. Solid line=high agitation. Dashed line=low agitation. 2b. Solid line=easy access to cigarettes. Dashed line=no cigarettes available. 2c. Solid line=high impulsiveness. Dashed line=low impulsiveness.