Table 1.
Fatigue (% of Fo) at 450 s | Recovery (% of Fo) at 1 min | |
---|---|---|
CON | 53.00 ± 1.19 | 81.57 ± 1.49 |
HU | 36.96 ± 3.31a | 72.52 ± 1.38a |
3DR | 29.66 ± 2.75a | 63.41 ± 2.64ab |
7DR | 26.06 ± 1.35ab | 66.05 ± 1.14a |
15DR | 21.96 ± 1.96ab | 66.78 ± 1.84a |
30DR | 33.59 ± 2.05a | 72.51 ± 2.09ac |
45DR | 45.87 ± 1.60cdef | 75.37 ± 1.65ede |
60DR | 51.67 ± 2.58cdefg | 80.18 ± 1.56ede |
Values are presented as means ± SE. Soleus muscle fatigue and postfatigue force recovery were calculated as the percentage of peak tetanic force at optimal muscle length (Fo). The force reduction at the end of fatigue treatment and the 1st minute after fatigue force recovery were compared in control mice (CON), mice with 4 wk of hindlimb unloading (HU), and those during 3–60 days of reloading (DR). The results showed that the fatigability and postfatigue force recovery were worsened to become lower than HU level at 3–15 days of reloading and gradually improved to the control level at 30–60 days reloading. n = 9 in CON, n = 4 in HU, n = 7 in 3DR, n = 6 in 7DR, n = 4 in 15DR, n = 8 in 30DR, n = 7 in 45DR, and n = 5 in 60DR.
P < 0.05 vs. CON,
P < 0.05 vs. HU,
P < 0.05 vs. 3DR,
P < 0.05 vs. 7DR,
P < 0.05 vs. 15DR,
P < 0.05 vs. 30DR,
P < 0.05 vs. 45DR. Statistical analysis was performed using 1-way ANOVA with mean comparison with Tukey's test.