Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 7;310(1):C27–C40. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00173.2015

Table 1.

Fatigability in force reduction of mouse soleus muscle after unloading and during postfatigue recovery

Fatigue (% of Fo) at 450 s Recovery (% of Fo) at 1 min
CON 53.00 ± 1.19 81.57 ± 1.49
HU 36.96 ± 3.31a 72.52 ± 1.38a
3DR 29.66 ± 2.75a 63.41 ± 2.64ab
7DR 26.06 ± 1.35ab 66.05 ± 1.14a
15DR 21.96 ± 1.96ab 66.78 ± 1.84a
30DR 33.59 ± 2.05a 72.51 ± 2.09ac
45DR 45.87 ± 1.60cdef 75.37 ± 1.65ede
60DR 51.67 ± 2.58cdefg 80.18 ± 1.56ede

Values are presented as means ± SE. Soleus muscle fatigue and postfatigue force recovery were calculated as the percentage of peak tetanic force at optimal muscle length (Fo). The force reduction at the end of fatigue treatment and the 1st minute after fatigue force recovery were compared in control mice (CON), mice with 4 wk of hindlimb unloading (HU), and those during 3–60 days of reloading (DR). The results showed that the fatigability and postfatigue force recovery were worsened to become lower than HU level at 3–15 days of reloading and gradually improved to the control level at 30–60 days reloading. n = 9 in CON, n = 4 in HU, n = 7 in 3DR, n = 6 in 7DR, n = 4 in 15DR, n = 8 in 30DR, n = 7 in 45DR, and n = 5 in 60DR.

a

P < 0.05 vs. CON,

b

P < 0.05 vs. HU,

c

P < 0.05 vs. 3DR,

d

P < 0.05 vs. 7DR,

e

P < 0.05 vs. 15DR,

f

P < 0.05 vs. 30DR,

g

P < 0.05 vs. 45DR. Statistical analysis was performed using 1-way ANOVA with mean comparison with Tukey's test.