Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov;24(4):S961–S973. doi: 10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0140

Table 2.

Accuracy by stimulus type and relevant ratios on the Northwestern Assessment of Verbs and Sentences (NAVS) and Northwestern Naming Battery.

Participant number NAVS Production subtest
NAVS Comprehension subtest
Northwestern Naming Battery
Agrammatism ratio a
Canonical Noncanonical Ratio Canonical Noncanonical Ratio Nouns Verbs Ratio
P02 13 3 0.23 13 15 1.15 16 16 1.00 0.79
P03 15 12 0.80 13 12 0.92 16 16 1.00 0.91
P09 13 1 0.08 14 6 0.43 16 15 0.94 0.48
P10 14 7 0.50 14 14 1.00 16 15 0.94 0.81
P04 b 0 0 0.00 11 7 0.64 13 12 0.92 0.78
P06 3 0 0.00 13 9 0.69 14 11 0.79 0.49
P08 b 0 0 0.00 13 13 1.00 6 3 0.50 0.75
P12 b 0 0 0.00 10 7 0.70 5 5 1.00 0.85
P11 b 0 0 0.00 9 10 1.11 10 8 0.80 0.96
a

Calculated by averaging the three ratios.

b

Participant could not complete the NAVS Production subtest. This ratio was excluded from the agrammatism ratio for these participants. In general, ratios less than 1 are consistent with agrammatism.