Table 4.
Theory of change (ToC) indicators at facility and community levels
ToC outcome | Indicator(s) | Study design |
---|---|---|
f. Service providers in post | Adequate numbers of human resources as per the mental healthcare plan are available at primary and community levels |
Case study: facility profile |
g. Service providers able to diagnose and treat priority mental disorders |
Change in knowledge and attitudes pre- and post-training | Case study: training and supervision evaluation |
h. Psychosocial interventions available | Staff trained in psychosocial interventions are available at the facility | Case study: facility profile |
i. People with mental disorders are identified and/or diagnosed in facilities |
Increased number and proportion of people correctly identified/ diagnosed with depression and alcohol use and treated with evidence-based interventions Increase in % mental health case-load as a proportion of total primary healthcare headcount |
Facility detection survey Case study: facility profile |
j. Services accessible, affordable and acceptable | Patients' perception of accessibility and acceptability of services | Qualitative cohort Cohort |
k. People with priority disorders receive treatment as intended for the required duration and adequately referred if necessary |
Increased number of people correctly receiving evidence-based treatment Number of patients who received psychosocial interventions at community level and facility level for the required duration |
Facility detection survey Cohort |
l. Improved outcomes for people with mental disorders treated by the programme and their families/carers |
Improved health, social and economic outcomes of people living with priority mental disorders |
Cohort |
m. Increased effective coverage of evidence- based mental health services |
Increased coverage of evidence-based mental health services | Community survey Cohort |
n. People with mental disorders are identified in the community |
Increased number of cases detected and managed by community health workers |
Case study: community profile |
o. People with mental disorders are willing to seek treatment |
Increase in help-seeking and earlier presentation at clinic | Facility detection survey |
p. Community is aware of mental illness and stigma is reduced |
Improved mental health literacy and decrease in stigma Community members are aware of local availability of treatment Decreased reported stigma by people with priority disorders |
Community survey Cohort |
q. Environmental, policy, social and political context of the district is monitored for modification of implementation |
Changes in environmental, policy, social and political contexts are monitored throughout implementation |
Case study: district profile |