Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 28;9(1):288. doi: 10.4081/oncol.2015.288

Table 1.

Meta-analyses for the association between red meat, processed meat and colorectal cancer risk.

Author, year published Meta-analysis center/country Number and type of studies for red meat RR for red meat (95% CI)* RR for processed meat (95% CI)*
Sandhu et al., 2001 UK 13 cohort 1.17 (1.05-1.31) 1.49 (1.22-1.81)
Norat et al., 2002 IARC, France 14 case-control and 9 cohort 1.35 (1.21-1.51) 1.31 (1.13-1.51)
Larsson and Wolk, 2006 Karolinska Inst., Sweden 15 (13 cohort and 2 case-control) 1.28 (1.15-1.42) 1.20 (1.11-1.31)
Huxley et al., 2009 Australia and Iran 26 cohort 1.21 (1.13-1.29) 1.19 (1.12-1.27)
Smolinska and Paluszkiewicz, 2009 Poland 22 (12 case-control and 10 cohort) 1.21 (1.07-1.37)** NA
Bastide et al., 2011 France 5 cohort 1.18 (1.06-1.32)** NA
Alexander et al., 2011 and 2015 USA, Mexico 27 cohort 1.11 (1.03-1.19) NA
Chan et al., 2011 UK and Netherlands 24 (2 case-cohort, 3 nested case-control and 19 cohort) 1.22 (1.11-1.34) 1.17 (1.09-1.25)
Johnson et al., 2013 USA 14 (8 case-control and 6 cohort) 1.13 (1.09-1.16)*** 1.09 (0.93-1.25)***
Bernstein et al., 2015 USA, China, Vietnam 2 cohort 1.06 (0.97-1.16)**** 1.15 (1.01-1.32)****

RR, relative risk; CI, confidence interval; NA, not available.

*Highest versus lovest intake

**only for colon cancer, not for rectum

***5 versus 0 servings/week

****multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio.