Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Comput Electr Eng. 2015 Aug 1;46:371–383. doi: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2015.02.009

Fig.13.

Fig.13

Comparison of dehazing performances of different algorithms for image ‘ny17’.(a) Original hazy image. (b) Restored by Fattal et al.’s algorithm. (c) Restored by Tan et al.’s algorithm. (d) Restored by Koef et al.’s algorithm. (e) Restored by Tarel et al.’s algorithm. (f) Restored by He et al.’s algorithm. (g) Restored by A.K. et al.’ algorithm. (h) Restored by proposed algorithm.