Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 28;45(6):193–204. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2015.45.6.193

Table 3. Comparison between the maxilla and the mandible treatment groups (n=35).

Clinical Parameters Total Maxilla Mandible P-value
Number of patients 35 13 22
Age (years) 52.97±9.42 48.69±7.05 55.5±9.86 0.026
Male/Female (Female%) 14/21 (60%) 6/7 (54%) 8/14 (64%) NS
FA/CAT (CAT%) 19/16 (46%) 8/5 (38%) 11/11 (50%) NS
Change in plaque index 0.28±0.27 0.29±0.26 0.28±0.29 NS
Baseline 1.34±0.36 1.12±0.36 1.47±0.30 0.013
Post-treatment 1.03±0.32 0.83±0.26 1.15±0.30 0.003
Change in gingival index 0.08±0.06 0.08±0.07 0.09±0.05 NS
Baseline 0.56±0.11 0.54±0.15 0.57±0.07 NS
Post-treatment 0.48±0.12 0.47±0.16 0.48±0.08 NS
Change in probing depth 0.35±0.34 0.30±0.25 0.38±0.39 NS
Baseline 2.58±0.78 2.64±0.79 2.55±0.79 NS
Post-treatment 2.23±0.72 2.34±0.74 2.17±0.71 NS
Change in bone level 0.39±0.62 0.36±0.46 0.42±0.71 NS
Baseline 3.53±1.26 3.35±1.55 3.63±1.09 NS
Post-treatment 3.13±0.95 2.99±1.27 3.21±0.72 NS
Treatment period (months) 5.01±2.20 4.85±2.44 5.11±2.10 NS

FA: orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances, CAT: clear aligner treatment, NS: statistically not significant.