TABLE 1.
Exposure group | n | Mean | Standard deviation | Minimuma | Maximum | N > LODb (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMA (ng/ml) | ||||||
Low | 593c | 8.7 | 7.8 | 0.35 | 32.5 | 58 (95.1) |
Medium | 38 | 8.9 | 8.1 | 0.35 | 35.5 | 37 (97.4) |
High | 98 | 11.9e | 7.7 | 0.35 | 33.9 | 96 (98.0) |
PMA (ng/ml) | ||||||
Low | 61 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.35 | 1.5 | 12 (19.7) |
Medium | 38 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.35 | 2.7 | 9 (23.7) |
High | 98 | 1.0e,f | 1.6 | 0.35 | 12.5 | 33 (33.7) |
MEAA (μg/ml)d | ||||||
Low | 61 | 0.07 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.2 | 2 (3.3) |
Medium | 38 | 0.42e | 0.89 | 0.07 | 4.8 | 13 (34.2) |
High | 98 | 6.8e,f | 15.2 | 0.07 | 110 | 92 (93.9) |
BMA (ng/mg creatinine) | ||||||
Low | 59c | 7.8 | 13.4 | 0.36 | 1.5 | — |
Medium | 38 | 5.2 | 3.5 | 0.47 | 2.7 | — |
High | 98 | 4.9 | 4.9 | 1.32 | 16.6 | — |
PMA (ng/mg creatinine) | ||||||
Low | 61 | 0.44 | 0.34 | 0.10 | 1.5 | — |
Medium | 38 | 0.44 | 0.57 | 0.09 | 3.4 | — |
High | 98 | 0.44 | 0.54 | 0.07 | 3.5 | — |
MEAA (μg/mg creatinine) | ||||||
Low | 61 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.02 | 0.30 | — |
Medium | 38 | 0.26e | 0.44 | 0.02 | 2.3 | — |
High | 98 | 2.9e,f | 6.4 | 0.02 | 45 | — |
Creatinine (mg/ml) | ||||||
Low | 61 | 1.50 | 0.81 | 0.23 | 3.59 | — |
Medium | 38 | 1.76 | 0.91 | 0.10 | 4.04 | — |
High | 98 | 2.48 | 1.10 | 0.25 | 5.50 | — |
Minimum = minimum concentration; 0.35 ng/ml for BMA and PMA and 0.07 μg/ml for MEAA.
LOD = limit of detection; 0.5 ng/ml for BMA and PMA and 0.1 μg/ml for MEAA. Samples with less than the LOD are coded as 0.35 ng/ml for BMA and PMA and 0.07 μg/ml for MEAA for use in statistical evaluation only. This is the LOD divided by the square root of 2 (see the text for a full explanation).
Two individuals from the low exposure group had BMA levels far exceeding any other measured value: 144 and 244 ng/ml. These were treated as outliers for purposes of determining the mean and standard deviation for this workgroup; thus, n = 59 for the mean and standard deviation (see the text for a full explanation).
MEAA data alone reported previously (B’Hymer et al. 2012).
The difference from the low exposure (control) group was statistically significant, p < .05.
The difference from the medium exposure group was statistically significant, p < .05.