Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 4.
Published in final edited form as: J Public Health (Oxf). 2014 Jun 10;37(1):107–115. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdu034

Table 2.

Prevalence of twice-a-day toothbrushing for boys and girls by family affluence, family structure, school type and rurality, % (s.e.)

Variable Boys Girls

Sample Size (N) 1274 1418
Family Affluence Scale
Low FAS 62.2 (2.7) 77.8 (1.8)
Medium FAS 62.7 (2.3) 85.5 (1.7)
High FAS 70.1 (2.6) 87.4 (1.6)
Family structure
Both parent 67.7 (1.8) 85.7 (1.2)
Single parent 60.1 (3.3) 77.0 (2.5)
Step family 56.9 (4.5) 81.4 (3.1)
Other 50.0 (11.8) 76.0 (8.8)
School type
Independent school 75.5 (7.7) 90.6 (4.1)
State school 64.4 (1.7) 83.1 (1.1)
Rurality
Urban 65.6 (2.3) 84.4 (1.4)
Remote towns 60.8 (4.3) 81.1 (3.9)
Accessible rural 65.2 (3.3) 77.3 (3.2)
Remote rural 64.5 (3.5) 86.0 (2.1)
Deprivation (SIMD quintiles)
SIMD 1 (most deprived) 56.1 (4.7) 75.0 (3.7)
SIMD 2 63.4 (4.1) 80.8 (2.5)
SIMD 3 60.8 (3.0) 79.4 (2.0)
SIMD 4 67.7 (2.4) 87.4 (1.6)
SIMD 5 (least deprived) 70.9 (3.5) 90.1 (2.2)

Clustering by school is accounted for in the calculation of SEs