Table 2.
Prevalence of twice-a-day toothbrushing for boys and girls by family affluence, family structure, school type and rurality, % (s.e.)
| Variable | Boys | Girls |
|---|---|---|
|
|
||
| Sample Size (N) | 1274 | 1418 |
| Family Affluence Scale | ||
| Low FAS | 62.2 (2.7) | 77.8 (1.8) |
| Medium FAS | 62.7 (2.3) | 85.5 (1.7) |
| High FAS | 70.1 (2.6) | 87.4 (1.6) |
| Family structure | ||
| Both parent | 67.7 (1.8) | 85.7 (1.2) |
| Single parent | 60.1 (3.3) | 77.0 (2.5) |
| Step family | 56.9 (4.5) | 81.4 (3.1) |
| Other | 50.0 (11.8) | 76.0 (8.8) |
| School type | ||
| Independent school | 75.5 (7.7) | 90.6 (4.1) |
| State school | 64.4 (1.7) | 83.1 (1.1) |
| Rurality | ||
| Urban | 65.6 (2.3) | 84.4 (1.4) |
| Remote towns | 60.8 (4.3) | 81.1 (3.9) |
| Accessible rural | 65.2 (3.3) | 77.3 (3.2) |
| Remote rural | 64.5 (3.5) | 86.0 (2.1) |
| Deprivation (SIMD quintiles) | ||
| SIMD 1 (most deprived) | 56.1 (4.7) | 75.0 (3.7) |
| SIMD 2 | 63.4 (4.1) | 80.8 (2.5) |
| SIMD 3 | 60.8 (3.0) | 79.4 (2.0) |
| SIMD 4 | 67.7 (2.4) | 87.4 (1.6) |
| SIMD 5 (least deprived) | 70.9 (3.5) | 90.1 (2.2) |
Clustering by school is accounted for in the calculation of SEs