Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan;9(1):113–120. doi: 10.1177/1756283X15593700

Table 4.

Subgroup analyses stratified by study designs, study locations, types of caffeine consumption.

Subgroup Number of studies Pooled MD (95% CI) Heterogeneity
NAFLD prevalence
All studies 3 2.36 (–35.92 to 40.64) p = 0.02, I2 = 76%
Study design
 Case-control 2 23.06 (–8.67 to 54.80) p = 0.75, I2 = 0%
 Population-base cross-sectional 1 −23.10 (−23.41 to −22.79)
Regular coffee 2 23.06 (–8.67 to 54.80) p = 0.75, I2 = 0%
NAFLD fibrosis
All studies 3 −39.95 (–132.72 to 52.82) p = 0.01, I2 = 78%
Study location
 USA 2 −23.89 (–145.22 to 97.44) p = 0.03, I2 = 79%
 Europe 1 −81.40 (–174.77 to 11.97)
Regular coffee 2 −91.35 (−139.42 to −43.27) p = 0.74, I2 = 0%

NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; MD, mean difference.