Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 4.
Published in final edited form as: J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014 Aug 27;68(12):1168–1174. doi: 10.1136/jech-2014-204182

Table 2.

Alarm status by arm and time period

Arm Full Education Practice Current Norm Total
At enrolment
 Total Homes Enrolled 130 53 141 324
  Number of homes with no working alarm pre 42 15 31 88
  Number of homes with some working alarms pre 88 38 110 236
  Percentage without any working alarms pre (95%CI) 32.3% (24.2 to 40.4) 28.3% (16.0 to 40.6) 22.0% (15.1 to 28.9) 27.2% (22.3 to 32.0)
 Mean number of alarms working on arrival at home (95%CI) 1.18 (0.98 to 1.18) 1.30 (0.98 to 1.62) 1.43 (1.25 to 1.60) 1.31 (1.18 to 1.43)
 Mean number of alarms installed (SE) 2.13 (0.09) 2.10 (0.13) 2.09 (0.09) 2.10 (0.06)
At follow-up
  Number of homes with no working alarm post 13 7 17 37
  Percentage without any working alarms post 10.0% 13.2% 12.1% 11.4%
 Increase in per cent with working alarms 22.3% 15.1% 9.9% 15.8%
 Percentage of decrease in homes without working alarms 69.0% 53.3% 45.2% 58.0%
 Mean number of working alarms post 2.06 2.00 1.89 1.96
 Increase in number of working alarms per home (95% CI) 0.88 (0.66 to 1.11) 0.70 (0.25 to 1.14) 0.45 (0.24 to 0.66) 0.65 (0.50 to 0.80)
 Percentage of increase in number of working alarms 42.9% 34.9% 23.7% 33.2%
 Mean time to follow-up (and SE) 721 (22) 867 (39) 646 (17) 715 (14)
 Method operability determined at follow-up
  Homes where alarms were tested at follow-up 117 49 130
  Resident report of alarm operability only 13 4 11
  Per cent tested 90.0% 92.5% 92.2%

Working alarms are hard-wired or have working batteries.