Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 4.
Published in final edited form as: J Health Commun. 2015 Jul 6;20(9):1052–1059. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1018607

Table 3.

Acceptability of SMS intervention by CMs and TMs

Question Percent “Yes” P-value
CMs
n = 12
TMs
n = 66
It is easy for me to send messages.a, b 100 71.2 0.032
Sending messages is time consuming. 33.3 31.8 1.00
It troubles me (is a nuisance) to send messages. 0.00 25.8 0.059
I find sending messages to be convenient. 100 97.0 1.00
I want to continue to send in data. 100 100 -
I am able to assess if I am connected to the network. 100 97.0 1.00
I used my phone to call or text other midwives.c 75.0 66.7 0.742
Using the phone makes me feel empowered. 100 100 -
I know why I am sending the SMS data. 91.7 89.4 1.00
I know what the SMS data will be used for.a, b 75.0 36.0 0.023
Someone else in my nuclear family owns a phone.c 100 87.9 0.346
a

Indicates p-value < 0.05 for t-test comparison between CMs and TMs

b

Indicates p-value < 0.05 for logistic regression; years of education is the predictor variable with p < 0.05.

c

Indicates p-value < 0.05 for logistic regression; cell phone signal strength is the predictor variable with p < 0.05.