Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 4;10(1):e0004249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004249

Fig 2. Comparison between sampling methods by village.

Fig 2

Includes species constituting at least 5% of collections from method 1 (resting collection near oviposition sites) or method 2 (light trap collection near hosts) using log odds ratio tests. Confidence intervals that do not include zero indicate significant method bias. Absence of data for a species from a village indicates the species was not observed by one or both sampling methods.