Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 4;10(1):e0004249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004249

Table 1. Mosquito species constituting at least 5% of resting collections near oviposition sites (method 1) or light traps near hosts (method 2).

Species Total number caught using method 1 % of sample from method 1 (95% confidence interval) Total number caught using method 2 % of sample from method 2 (95% confidence interval)
Culex tritaeniorhynchus 100 17 (14.3–20.5) 42829 58 (57.4–58.1)
Anopheles peditaeniatus 11 2 (0.8–3) 10281 14 (13.6–14.1)
Culex gelidus 58 10 (7.6–12.6) 4490 6 (5.9–6.2)
Culex pseudovishnui 157 27 (23.7–30.9) 4203 6 (5.5–5.8)
Culex vishnui 34 6 (4–7.8) 1118 1 (1.1–1.2)
Armigeres subalbatus 48 8 (6.1–10.6) 122 < 1 (0.1–0.2)
Armigeres kesseli 29 5 (3.3–6.8) 58 < 1 (0.06–0.1)