Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 4.
Published in final edited form as: J Aging Phys Act. 2010 Jul;18(3):261–279. doi: 10.1123/japa.18.3.261

Table 3.

Adoption-Phase (Baseline to 6 Months) Comparisons Between Groupsa

Change, M ± SD
ANOVA
Group Comparisons, ES, Mean Difference [CI] if p ≤ .05
TC, n = 37 WE, n = 39 C, n = 56 F p TC vs. C WE vs. C TC vs. WE
Physical Functioning
 Balance
  single-leg stance (s) 6.5 ± 9.4 3.9 ± 13.9 0.9 ± 7.3 3.36 .038 0.54, 5.5
[0.4, 10.7]
0.29 0.25
  functional reach (n = 103; in.) −0.02 ± 1.4 0.4 ± 1.8 0.3 ± 2.9 0.29 .745 −0.15 0.04 −0.19
 Strength
  arm curls (no. in 30 s) 3.7 ± 4.5 3.6 ± 4.6 3.5 ± 3.7 0.01 .991 0.03 0.02 0.01
  chair stands (no. in 30 s) 3.5 ± 3.8 3.4 ± 3.6 2.0 ± 3.2 3.05 .051 0.46 0.41 0.05
 Flexibility (n = 130)
  back-scratch test (cm) 0.8 ± 3.4 3.7 ± 6.7 1.1 ± 3.3 4.67 .011 −0.07 0.55, 2.5
[0.3, 4.8]
−0.62, 2.9
[0.4, 5.4]
  sit-and-reach test (cm) 1.4 ± 5.1 2.3 ± 3.5 1.7 ± 3.3 0.49 .613 −0.06 0.16 −0.22
 Cardiorespiratory endurance (n = 129)b
  heart rate (beats/min) −3.2 ± 6.3 −4.8 ± 5.6 −3.8 ± 8.5 0.51 .600 0.08 −0.15 0.23
  systolic blood pressure, mm Hg −3.2 ± 15.8 −2.9 ± 15.1 −3.3 ± 17.5 0.01 .993 0.01 0.03 −0.02
  rating of perceived exertion −0.1 ± 1.5 −0.4 ± 1.4 −0.4 ± 1.3 0.80 .454 0.26 0.06 0.20
Cognitive Functioning
 Animal-naming test (n = 131; no. in 60 s) 0.8 ± 4.1 2.0 ± 4.7 0.6 ± 4.1 1.18 .311 0.04 0.31 −0.27
 Digits forward (sequence length) 0.03 ± 1.8 −0.5 ± 1.6 −0.05 ± 1.6 1.33 .268 0.05 −0.29 0.34
 Digits backward (sequence length) 0.8 ± 1.7 −0.7 ± 1.9 −0.1 ± 1.6 7.75 <.001 0.55, 0.9
[0.1, 1.8]
−0.34 0.90, 1.5
[0.6, 2.5]

Note. ES = effect size; CI = confidence interval; TC = Tai Chi; WE = Western exercise; C = control.

a

Submaximal treadmill test unadjusted for antihypertensive medication, age, or gender.

b

Intention-to-treat analysis, missing data = last observation carried forward.