Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Interpers Violence. 2014 Oct 13;30(14):2541–2561. doi: 10.1177/0886260514553113

Table 3.

Logistic Regression Results for Females, Predicting Sexual Harassment Perpetration at Time 2.

Variable Entered B Wald Significance Exp(B) 95% CI for Exp(B)
Lower Upper
Block 1
 Grade Time 1 0.45 13.12 .00 1.58 1.23 2.01
 Race (White) 0.05 0.05 .83 1.05 0.70 1.58
Block 2
 Sexual harassment perpetration Time 1 0.25 1.01 .31 1.28 0.80 2.07
 Homophobic teasing perpetration Time 1 0.22 1.99 .16 1.25 0.92 1.71
 Bullying perpetration Time 1 1.17 11.97 .00 3.21 1.66 6.22
 Homophobic teasing perpetration Time 1 × Bullying perpetration Time 1 −0.16 1.54 .22 0.85 0.66 1.10

Note. The criterion variable of sexual harassment at Time 2 was coded as 0 for not being a perpetrator (no perpetration) and 1 for perpetrators (any perpetration). Race was dichotomized with 1 as African American and 2 as White. CI = confidence interval.