. 2016 Jan 4;12(1):e1004686. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004686

Table 2. Comparison of predicted and observed R _h.

Propensity Scale	Average Error (Å) ^a	R² ^b	Average Normalized Error ^c	R² ^d
Null (random coil)	7.1 ± 3.7	0.797	-0.28 ± 0.13	0.265
Kallenbach	13.4 ± 5.4	0.819	0.51 ± 0.15	0.301
Creamer	8.4 ± 4.3	0.817	0.32 ± 0.13	0.297
Hilser	2.5 ± 1.8	0.825	0.006 ± 0.12	0.407
Composite	2.4 ± 1.8	0.834	0.015 ± 0.12	0.423
Static	2.6 ± 2.0	0.799	-0.016 ± 0.13	0.291

^adetermined from |predicted R _h—observed R _h|

^bcoefficient of determination, correlation of predicted R _h and observed R _h

^cdetermined from (predicted R _h—observed R _h)/(random coil R _h)

^dcoefficient of determination, correlation of normalized error and net charge density

Table 2. Comparison of predicted and observed R h.