Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 29;10(12):e0145601. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145601

Table 1. Theta values for allelic imbalance analysis.

SNP 212 SNP 1533 SNP 1063
Experiment 1 a Susceptible Resistant Susceptible Resistant Susceptible Resistant
Rep 1 b 0.1894 a 0.3439 0.5882 0.6592 0.3201 0.3737
Rep 2 0.2335 0.4187 0.607 0.6850 0.2509 0.3860
Rep 3 0.2634 0.4705 0.5903 0.6775 0.2924 0.3765
Rep 4 0.2702 0.4609 0.4251 0.7285 0.2070 0.3830
Rep 5 0.3180 0.4698 0.4775 0.6734 0.3694 0.3508
Mean 0.2549 0.4327 0.5376 0.6847 0.2879 0.374
Std Dev d 0.0475 0.0540 0.0813 0.0262 0.0624 0.0138
P e 0.00014 0.00214 0.00243
Experiment 2
Rep 1 0.2262 0.3309 0.4815 0.5297 0.1614 0.2084
Rep 2 0.2201 0.3086 0.4933 0.5238 0.1779 0.1796
Rep 3 0.1691 0.3076 0.4288 0.5422 0.1450 0.2192
Rep 4 0.1727 0.3484 0.3894 0.5090 0.1474 0.1812
Rep 5 0.1713 0.2608 0.4208 0.5984 0.1399 0.2389
Mean 0.1919 0.3112 0.4427 0.5406 0.1543 0.2054
Std Dev 0.0286 0.0329 0.0435 0.0344 0.0154 0.0253
P c 0.00014 0.00214 0.00243

a Experiment 1 and 2 are replicates of the entire experiment

b Rep 1–5 are technical replicates within each experiment

c Significant differences in theta values for SNPs from SCN populations grown on susceptible and resistant soybean lines indicate allelic imbalances

d Std Dev = standard deviation

e P = probability from one-tailed Student's T-Test.