Table 2.
Age | Gender | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
N | Mean(SD) | Male | Female | |
Sample 1 | ||||
Non | 366 | 33.36(10.96) | 189 | 230b |
Social | 33 | 32.35(10.80) | 19 | 37c |
Regular | 36 | 32.93(9.84) | 28 | 31 |
Social Dual | 90 | 34.85(11.03)a | 36 | 54d |
Regular Dual | 66 | 31.42(8.35)a | 47 | 19b, c, d |
| ||||
Sample 2 | ||||
Non | 494 | 34.12(11.08) | 255 | 237 |
Social | 29 | 32.52(10.27) | 19 | 10 |
Regular | 46 | 33.87(8.98) | 25 | 21 |
Social Dual | 90 | 32.96(9.64) | 45 | 45 |
Regular Dual | 56 | 36.14(12.71) | 28 | 28 |
Note. Independent samples t-tests were conducted on all age relationships. Chi-square difference tests were conducted on all ethnicity and gender relationships. There were no significant differences by ethnicity. Relationships marked with a superscript were significant at p<.05 and are described below. All other relationships were not significant at p<.05.
Sample 1:
t(155)=2.12, p=.03;
χ2= 15.55, p<.01;
χ2= 16.96, p<.01;
χ2= 14.90, p<.01