Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 30;10(12):e0145540. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145540

Table 6. Hierarchical ascendant classification (HAC) of an apple core collection in six clusters according to nine morphological traits measured at the end of the experiment. Information of the physiological traits for each group is also presented.

Clusters
Traits A1.1 A1.2 A2 B1.1 B1.2 B2
No. of genotypes 17 20 32 17 56 41
Morphological traits (whole-plant)
f_Bio (g) 147 a 110 c 124 b 113 bc 107 c 85 d
f_LA (cm2) 2906 a 2354 b 2878 a 2166 bc 2226 b 1933 c
H (cm) 144 a 119 c 127 bc 130 b 124 bc 102 d
Nb_L (#) 43.98 ab 41.25 c 46.26 a 43.89 b 45.28 ab 40.82 c
BS_diam (mm) 8.67 b 8.49 bc 9.15 a 8.63 b 8.21 cd 8.09 d
Morphological traits (metamer with the longest internode)
IN_L_max (mm) 45.05 a 40.73 b 35.59 cd 41.37 b 35.76 c 33.84 d
IN_diam (mm) 6.87 b 6.67 bcd 7.20 a 6.75 bc 6.51 cd 6.39 d
Leaf_area (cm-2) 77.36 a 75.92 ab 70.34 b 57.57 c 59.24 c 57.63 c
Leaf:shoot (g g-1) 0.76 b 0.78 a 0.76 b 0.74 c 0.77 b 0.78 a
Physiological traits
Plant_T (g day-1) 239 a 218 b 236 a 214 b 211 b 195 c
Leaf _T (g cm-2 day-1) 0.1276 ab 0.1326 ab 0.1236 ab 0.1387 a 0.1351 a 0.1348 ab
WUE (g g-1 day-1) 0.0121 a 0.0102 bc 0.0092 c 0.0101 bc 0.0104 b 0.0089 c
Percentage of reduction relative to cluster A1.1
f_Bio -25 -16 -23 -27 -42
Plant_T -9 -1 -10 -12 -18

For each group and trait, a one-way ANOVA was performed to estimate cluster effects. For each variable, mean values with different letters indicates significant differences between groups according to Tukey’s test and a P<0.05. See Table 1 for the interpretation of traits abbreviation.