Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 5;6:1144. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.01144

Table 2.

Results from differential gene expression analysis between stages of Saltugilia australis (Sa) and S. splendens subsp. grantii (Sg).

Comparison Up-regulated transcriptome Biological process Cellular component Molecular function Total
Sa Mature vs. Sg Mature Sa Mature 4 130 41 382
Sg Mature 1 133 32 354
Sa Mature vs. Sa Half Sa Mature 0 133 7 208
Sa Half 1 46 15 92
Sa Half vs. Sa Mid Sa Half 0 1 1 4
Sa Mid 0 22 3 39
Sa Mature vs. Sa Mid Sa Mature 1 13 7 28
Sa Mid 1 31 4 67
Sg Mature vs. Sg Half Sg Mature 2 176 77 427
Sg Half 7 263 40 452
Sg Mature vs. Sg Mid Sg Mature 2 184 98 506
Sg Mid 4 166 40 280
Sg Mature vs. Sg Small Sg Mature 3 220 44 474
Sg Small 7 286 38 526
Sg Half vs. Sg Mid Sg Half 0 8 1 19
Sg Mid 0 12 5 27
Sg Half vs. Sg Small Sg Half 6 375 65 743
Sg Small 4 306 123 713
Sg Mid vs. Sg Small Sg Mid 6 411 91 819
Sg Small 5 457 160 1017

GO categories for the up-regulated transcripts from comparison are listed, as well as the total number of up-regualated transcripts in each transcriptome.