Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 5.
Published in final edited form as: Patient Educ Couns. 2014 May 14;96(3):404–410. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.005

Table 3. Scale intercorrelations and correlations of the new measure with other measures of health literacy.

HL NUMa FACTa LISa TOFHLA
Reading
TOFHLA
Numeracy
REALMb SAHLSAb Hospitalc Formsc Infoc
HL 1.00 .82** .77** .65** .69** .50** .59** .52** −.31** .37** −.34**
NUM 1.00 .53** .57** .59** .49** .50** .33** −.29** .30** −.28**
FACT 1.00 .42** .44** .36** .47** .50** −.24** .26** −.27**
LIS 1.00 .55** .34** .36** .62** −.05 .32** −.17*
TOFHLA
Reading
1.00 .53** .72** .51** −.31** .39** −.32**
TOFHLA
Numeracy
1.00 .47** .31** −.25** .25** −.31**
REALMb 1.00 n/ab −.34** .22** −.30**
SAHLSAb 1.00 .20* .19* −.30*
Hospitalc 1.00 −.33** .52**
Formsc 1.00 −.32**
Infoc 1.00
*

Correlation p < 0.01;

**

Correlation p < 0.001.

a

Five items on the FACT scale are also included in the HL scale, increasing scale intercorrelations.

b

The REALM was only administered to English speakers (n = 236), and the SAHLSA was only administered to Spanish speakers (n = 239).

c

Hospital = Need help reading hospital materials; Forms = Confident in filling out medical forms; Info= Difficulty in understanding written medical information