Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Anim Behav. 2016 Jan 1;111:341–347. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.11.006

Table 2.

Comparison of deer mouse behaviours between sites using Student’s t test (all encounter behaviours and GUD) or chi-square binomial proportion test (proportion of time vigilant)

Less diverse More diverse t or χ2 P
Encounter behaviours and aggression
Time on trays (s)a 102.9±17.3 43.6±8.9 2.83 0.006
Tray×night indexa 8.8±1.6 4.9±0.9 2.02 0.048
Distance travelled (m)a 381.3±99.6 124.4±48.5 2.15 0.035
Exposed tray index (s)a 650.4±238.7 112.8±78.7 1.94 0.054
Aggressive interactionsa 1.08±0.38 0.20±0.20 1.45 0.163
Predator avoidance behaviours
GUD (g)a 0.81±0.07 1.29±0.17 2.99 0.003
Proportion of time vigilant 0.04 0.07 57.8 <0.001

GUD: giving-up density.

a

Mean ± SE.