Table 3.

Pass marks using modified Angoff for the junior residents, Borderline Groups (BG) and Borderline Regression (BLR) method

Station	Modified Angoff method (95 % CI)	Borderline groups method (95 % CI)	Borderline regression method (95 % CI)	Significance
1	0.35 (0.31-0.4)	0.53 (0.52-0.54)	0.52 (0.46-0.58)	P < 0.001
2	0.39 (0.33-0.45)	0.54 (0.53-0.56)	0.56 (0.51-0.61)	P < 0.001
3	0.32 (0.27-0.37)	0.48 (0.47-0.48)	0.47 (0.44-0.51)	P < 0.001
4	0.32 (0.27-0.37)	0.58 (0.49-0.66)	0.55 (0.46-0.64)	P < 0.001
5	0.38 (0.31-(0.46)	0.54 (0.53-0.54)	0.56 (0.51-0.6)	P < 0.001
6	0.38 (0.31-0.44)	0.5 (0.48-0.51)	0.51 (0.47-0.54)	P < 0.001
Total	0.36 (0.3-0.42)	0.53 (0.5-0.55)	0.53 (0.43-0.62)	P < 0.001
Total + 1SEM	0.39	0.56	0.56	P < 0.001

A significant difference was seen for the modified Angoff and the BG/BLR methods for junior residents for all stations and overall (all p < 0.001)