Table 5.
Weight and significance of variables remaining in the best selected model for CNM prevalence in rodents
| Variable | B | S.E. | Wald | df | P | Exp(B) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Habitat (1) | −0.696 | 0.395 | 3.101 | 1 | 0.078 | 0.499 |
| Season (1) | −1.313 | 0.406 | 10.438 | 1 | 0.001 | 0.269 |
| Genus | 9.057 | 2 | 0.011 | |||
| Genus (1) | −1.447 | 0.566 | 6.534 | 1 | 0.011 | 0.235 |
| Genus (2) | −1.792 | 0.598 | 8.979 | 1 | 0.003 | 0.167 |
| Constant | −0.410 | 0.517 | 0.628 | 1 | 0.428 | 0.664 |
Categorical variables codings: Habitat (1), urban/suburban habitat = Bratislava; Season (1), Spring; Genus (1), Apodemus, Genus (2), Myodes; variables removed by backward method were sex; B, parameter estimate; Wald, Wald statistic = test of significance of the regression coefficient; P, significance level