Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Cutan Pathol. 2015 Apr 21;42(5):333–345. doi: 10.1111/cup.12485

Table 2.

Modes and quality of clinical communication by predominant referral base

Referral Type Dermatology only (N=311) Primary Care, General Surgery, Pathology (N=259)
Role as a dermatopathologist
Role 1 – Provide specific histopathologic diagnosis and description of findings. 26/290 (9%) 19/235 (8%)
Role 2 – Provide clinically meaningful histopathologic interpretation and guidance on decision making and specific histopathologic diagnosis and description of findings 260/290 (90%) 214/235 (91%)
Level of satisfaction or dissatisfaction with paper/electronic requisition forms used by requesting clinicians for conveying clinical information related to skin biopsy specimens
Very or somewhat satisfied 196/287 (68%) 134/233 (58%)
Very or somewhat dissatisfied 91/287 (32%) 99/233 (42.5%)
For information that is provided by requesting clinicians, please rate the quality of that information
Good, very good or excellent 188/297 (63%) 117/242 (48%)
Fair or poor 109/297 (37%) 125/242 (52%)
In your experience, how important is the dermatologic experience of the requesting clinician to the quality of the clinical information provided?
Very or somewhat important 279/293 (95%) 236/244 (97%)
Not important 14/293 (5%) 8/244 (3%)