Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 5;11(1):e0145817. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145817

Table 4. Effectiveness of matching patients to their preference.

Research objective Sig. effect of treatment matched to patients’ preference No sign. effect
Substance use outcomes** n = 3[44,45,39] n = 6[42,43,46,47,50,51]*
Mental health outcomes*** / n = 2[51,52]
Social-related outcomes**** / n = 2[47,50]*
Process-related***** n = 1[47] n = 5[42,48,49,50,52]

* Due to insufficient information, for [43] and [47], results could not be definitely assigned.

** Substance use outcomes: reduction of consumption, severity of dependence, or abstinence.

*** Mental health outcomes: psychiatric composite (ASI), or health status.

**** Social-related outcomes: family problems, housing problems, or legal assistance.

***** Process-related outcomes: adherence, retention, or satisfaction.

[42]Adamson et al. (2005), [43]Bernstein et al. (1999), [44]Brown et al. (2002), [45]Friedmann et al. (1999), [46]Gossop et al. (1986), [47]Hser et al. (1999), [48]Marlowe et al. (2003), [49]McCrady et al. (2011), [50]McKay et al. (1995), [51]McKay et al. (1998), [52]Sterling et al. (1997).