Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 21;4(4):241–252. doi: 10.1159/000367738

Table 3.

Enhancement patterns of HCC and ICC with different size

HCC (n=546)
ICC (n=273)
<2 cm (n=33) 2–5 cm (n=165) >5 cm (n=348) p <2 cm (n=3) 2–5 cm (n=75) >5 cm (n=195) p
Arterial phase
Enhancement level 0.416 0.641
 Hyperenhancement 32 (97.0) 157 (95.2) 336 (96.6) 3 (100) 61 (81.3) 170 (87.2)
 Isoenhancement 0 (0) 4 (2.4) 9 (2.6) 0 (0) 4 (5.3) 8 (4.1)
 Hypoenhancement 1 (3.0) 4 (2.4) 3 (0.9) 0 (0) 10 (13.3) 17 (8.7)
Enhancement distribution 0.000 0.000
 Homogeneous 29 (87.9) 121 (73.3) 103 (29.6) 3 (100) 17 (22.7) 7 (3.6)
 Heterogeneous 3 (9.1) 42 (25.5) 237 (68.1) 0 (0) 17 (22.7) 45 (23.1)
 Peripheral rim-like 1 (3.0) 2 (1.2) 8 (2.3) 0 (0) 41 (54.6) 143 (73.3)

Portal phase 0.058 NA

 Hyperenhancement 0 (0) 5 (3.0) 5 (1.4) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 Isoenhancement 8 (24.2) 36 (21.8) 48 (13.8) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 Hypoenhancement 25 (75.8) 124 (75.2) 295 (84.8) 3 (100) 75 (100) 195 (100)

Delayed phase 0.000 NA

 Hyperenhancement 0 (0) 2 (1.2) 1 (0.3) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 Isoenhancement 5 (15.2) 12 (7.3) 4 (1.1) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 Hypoenhancement 28 (84.8) 151 (91.5) 343 (98.6) 3 (100) 75 (100) 195 (100)

Unless otherwise indicated, data are number of nodules, with percentages in parentheses.