Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan;20(1):5–13. doi: 10.1177/1362361314562616

Table 3.

Adaptive function before and after the school transition.

Time 1 – end of primary school
Time 2 – start of secondary school
Cohen’s D Significance of t-test Pearson correlation Significance of McNemar’s test
Mean (SD) % in clinical range Mean (SD) % in clinical range
Parent report (N = 26)a
 Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scale
  Communication 77.96 (11.49) 77.8% 77.73 (12.57) 77.8% −0.01 0.942 0.12 1
  Daily living 78.77 (16.08) 74.1% 79.88 (12.53) 74.1% 0.14 0.524 0.84*** 1
  Socialisation 75.27 (13.12) 70.4% 69.77 (14.60) 85.2% −0.39 0.062 0.47* 0.219
  Adaptive behaviour composite 75.62 (10.71) 85.2% 73.81 (10.30) 85.2% −0.20 0.332 0.61** 1
Teacher report (N = 20)
 Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scale
  Communication 85.79 (9.27) 45.0% 74.74 (15.69) 80.0% 0.73 0.005 0.36 0.016
  Daily living 85.40 (13.85) 55.0% 77.35 (15.32) 70.0% 0.44 0.068 0.19 0.453
  Socialisation 77.90 (9.25) 80.0% 73.50 (11.81) 80.0% 0.39 0.107 0.41 1
  Adaptive behaviour composite 81.85 (9.75) 65.0% 73.70 (11.72) 85.0% 0.75 0.004 0.47* 0.219

SD: standard deviation.

a

Two parents did not provide data on adaptive function at follow-up.

*

p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001