Table 3.
Stratification | Number of subjects | Propotion preferring 0.1%* | Propotion preferring 0.5%* | Propotion preferring 1.0%* | Propotion preferring 2.0%* | Propotion preferring 3.5%* |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Group | 104 | 0.50 | 0.51 | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.63 |
Prefer Skim | 22 | 0.50 | 0.45 | 0.50 | 0.41 | 0.27 |
Prefer 2% | 45 | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.67 |
Prefer Whole | 31 | 0.45 | 0.58 | 0.61 | 0.65 | 0.84 |
Drink Skim | 45 | 0.53 | 0.47 | 0.53 | 0.44 | 0.47 |
Drink 2% | 40 | 0.48 | 0.53 | 0.55 | 0.63 | 0.73 |
Drink Whole | 15 | 0.40 | 0.60 | 0.73 | 0.80 | 1.0 |
Low HC | 34 | 0.50 | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.42 | 0.56 |
Medium HC | 34 | 0.47 | 0.53 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.65 |
High HC | 36 | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.62 | 0.68 | 0.71 |
vs. a control sample containing 0.1% Fat
Bolded proportions are significant at p < 0.05 using the binomial distribution for paired preference tests.