Table 1.

Hierarchical regression analyses with condition, BMI, gender, and their interactions as predictors.

Outcome	Step 1		β	Step 2		β	Step 3		β
Rejection Expectations	F (4, 153)= 16.78, p<.001, R2=.305	Cond BMI Gend RSES	−.02 .19** .12† −.47***	ΔF (3, 150)= 1.58, p=.197, ΔR2=.021	CondxBMI CondxGend BMIxGend	.13† .05 .06	ΔF (1, 149)= 7.398, p=.007, ΔR2=.032	CondxBMIxGend	.29**
Executive Functioning	F (4, 150)= 4.18, p=.003, R2=.100	Cond BMI Gend RSES	−.14† .27** .02 .13	ΔF (3, 147)= .74, p=.529, ΔR2=.013	CondxBM CondxGend BMIxGend	.05 .08 .08	ΔF (1, 146)= 5.00, p=.027, ΔR2=.029	CondxBMIxGend	.18*
State Self- Esteem	F (4, 153)= 54.49, p <.001, R2=.588	Cond BMI Gend RSES	−.07 −.28*** −.16** .64***	ΔF (3, 150)= 2.20, p=.091, ΔR2=.017	CondxBMI CondxGend BMIxGend	−.12* .03 −.06	ΔF (1, 149)= 6.26, p=.013, ΔR2=.016	CondxBMIxGend	−.13*
Self-Conscious Emotions	F (4, 153)= 13.77, p<.001, R2=.265	Cond BMI Gend RSES	.14† .13† .17* −.41***	ΔF (3, 150)= 1.30, p=.276, ΔR2=.019	CondxBMI CondxGend BMIxGend	.14† .02 .01	ΔF (1, 149)= 4.35, p=.039, ΔR2=.020	CondxBMIxGend	.15*
Stress Emotions	F (4, 153)= 5.28, p=.001, R2=.121	Cond BMI Gend RSES	−.004 .19* .16* −.21**	ΔF (3, 150)= 1.15, p=.330, ΔR2=.020	CondxBMI CondxGend BMIxGend	.10 .03 .11	ΔF (1, 149)= .03, p=.868, ΔR2=.000	CondxBMIxGend	−.01

^†Note: p<.10,

^*p<.05,

^**p<.01,

^***p<.001