Table 1.
Endpoint | Definition | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|---|
Response rate (RR) | Assessed by the RECIST criteria on the basis of imaging studies. GCIG has defined changes in CA-125 as a response criterion |
Objective Quantifiable Results quickly available Tumor shrinkage appealing to patient and physician |
Difficult to measure accurately and reproducibly in ovarian cancer Not considered sufficient as a primary endpoint for phase III trials Not necessarily a clinically relevant benefit for the patient |
Patient-recorded out- comes (PRO) |
Symptom-based parameters | Direct clinical benefit as perceived and quantified by patient |
Need randomized blinded studies Subjective and dependent on limited validation instruments |
Progression-free surviva (PFS) |
Time from entry into trial to progression of disease, death or lost to follow up |
Provides answer sooner Avoids the impact of post-progression thera- py Preferred to TTP by regulatory agencies |
Requires blinded, placebo-controlled design Requires careful and symmetric timing of assess ments |
Time to progression (TIP) |
Time from entry into trial to progression of disease | Similar to PFS | Does not include deaths |
Overall survival | Time from entry into trial to death or lost to follow up | Clear cut end point of death Indisputably indicative of clinical benefit |
Longer time to answer Impacted by post-progression therapy |
Time to tumor growth | Utilizes prescribed longitudinal tumor models | Novel metric In some models best predictor of OS Reduces time and cost |
Not validated in ovarian cancer Subjectivity in assessment |