Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 6.
Published in final edited form as: Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Nov 15;132(1):8–17. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.11.008

Table 1.

Endpoint characteristics.

Endpoint Definition Advantages Disadvantages
Response rate (RR) Assessed by the RECIST criteria on the basis of
imaging studies. GCIG has defined changes in CA-125
as a response criterion
Objective
Quantifiable
Results quickly available
Tumor shrinkage appealing to patient and
physician
Difficult to measure accurately and reproducibly
in ovarian cancer
Not considered sufficient as a primary endpoint
for phase III trials
Not necessarily a clinically relevant benefit for the
patient
Patient-recorded out-
 comes (PRO)
Symptom-based parameters Direct clinical benefit as perceived and
quantified by patient
Need randomized blinded studies
Subjective and dependent on limited validation
instruments
Progression-free surviva
 (PFS)
Time from entry into trial to progression of disease,
death or lost to follow up
Provides answer sooner
Avoids the impact of post-progression thera-
py
Preferred to TTP by regulatory agencies
Requires blinded, placebo-controlled design
Requires careful and symmetric timing of assess
ments
Time to progression
 (TIP)
Time from entry into trial to progression of disease Similar to PFS Does not include deaths
Overall survival Time from entry into trial to death or lost to follow up Clear cut end point of death
Indisputably indicative of clinical benefit
Longer time to answer
Impacted by post-progression therapy
Time to tumor growth Utilizes prescribed longitudinal tumor models Novel metric
In some models best predictor of OS
Reduces time and cost
Not validated in ovarian cancer
Subjectivity in assessment