Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 22;82(1):184–191. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02436-15

TABLE 3.

Results of the ANOVA testsa

Source of variationb dfc Total perithecia
Mature perithecia
Ascospores released
% of varianced F P value % of variance F P value % of variance F P value
1. Exposure condition 2 97.65 793.3 0.001 93.53 193.3 0.005 25.14 1.9 0.348
2. Stalk type 1 0.05 5.0 0.269 0.03 0.1 0.801 1.13 794.0 0.023
3. Year 1 0.24 4.6 0.237 0.82 2.5 0.390 26.70 4.1 0.186
1 × 2 2 0.05 1.2 0.459 0.03 0.1 0.919 0.56 2.5 0.285
1 × 3 2 0.12 3.2 0.238 0.48 1.2 0.446 13.41 59.5 0.017
2 × 3 1 0.01 0.5 0.556 0.28 1.4 0.353 0.00 0.0 0.921
1 × 2 × 3 2 0.04 0.6 0.554 0.39 4.2 0.021 0.23 0.9 0.413
a

ANOVA tests were performed for total number of perithecia, numbers of mature perithecia, and numbers of ascospores produced on two types of maize stalk residues (artificially inoculated and naturally infested by Fusarium graminearum). Stalks were exposed outdoors in 2 years and on three exposure conditions: (i) on a grass lawn and exposed to rain; (ii) on a piece of wet florist foam and exposed to rain; (iii) on a grass lawn under a transparent cover.

b

A factorial ANOVA was performed considering exposure conditions (fixed factor with 3 levels), stalk origin (fixed factor with 2 levels), and year (random factor with 2 levels), with 5 replicates (n = 60).

c

df, degrees of freedom.

d

Percentage of total variance accounted for by the source of variation.