TABLE 4.
PID | Factor | % by which the factor accounted for total variance of data seta |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Infectivity |
RNA titer |
Bacterial count | |||||||
MNV | SaV | TV | HuNoV | MNV | SaV | TV | |||
1 | Interaction | 0.9 | 14.0 | 1.0 | 12.3 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 2.0 | 6.7 |
Plant | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 7.2 | 6.6 | 42 | 6.8 | 24.9 | |
Stress | 0.6 | 4.1 | 2.6 | 11.6 | 5.6 | 3.9 | 13.4 | 4.6 | |
7 | Interaction | 3.1 | — | 7.2 | 4.0 | 6.4 | 1.6 | 6.0 | 9 |
Plant | 53.9 | — | 45.8 | 3.7 | 15.2 | 65 | 25.6 | 59 | |
Stress | 15.8 | — | 15.8 | 16.1 | 3.6 | 0.6 | 2.2 | 2.0 | |
14 | Interaction | — | — | — | 7.3 | 8.7 | 2.8 | 4.0 | 3.0 |
Plant | — | — | — | 1.2 | 1.0 | 13.2 | 0.2 | 10.6 | |
Stress | — | — | — | 17 | 30.2 | 6.4 | 31.9 | 11.8 |
Numbers in bold indicate a significant effect (P < 0.05) for that factor. Statistical analyses were performed by two-way ANOVA. —, no data were available because infectivity titers were below the method's detection limit.