Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 29;10(12):e0145646. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145646

Table 1. The photosynthetic rate (P N, μmol•m−2s−1), flag leaf width (FLW, cm), total leaf area (TLA, cm2• plant−1), in the leaves of Teqing (TQ) and NIL-SS1 (SS1) at different growth stages and the spikelet number per panicle (SNP), grain yield (g•plant−1) in 2009 and/or 2010.

Location G Stage P N FLW TLA SNP Yield
2010 Beijing TQ Tillering 26.6 ±0.70 0.81 ±0.011 1592.6 ±85.1
SS1 23.3 ±1.17* 0.89 ±0.012* 1888.7 ±76.5*
TQ Booting 15.7 ±0.50 1.09 ±0.013
SS1 13.8 ±0.11* 1.33 ±0.011*
TQ Flowering 22.1 ±0.44 1.42 ±0.003 2906.9 ±98.2
SS1 19.7 ±1.05* 1.75 ±0.121* 3471.4 ±112.9*
TQ Grain Filling 10.2±0.71 1.44 ±0.023 2062.5 ±61.4 238.2 ±10.5 34.2 ±0.30
SS1 13.1 ±1.46 * 1.77 ±0.012* 2139.2 ±74.5 296.2 ±7.41* 35.5 ±0.22
Guangdong TQ Grain Filling 1.51 ±0.031 259.3 ±12.3 37.1 ±0.55
SS1 1.79 ±0.029* 305.6±11.6* 40.0 ±0.68*
2009 Beijing TQ Flowering 18.7±1.23
SS1 15.2 ±1.67*

Note: The values were different significantly (p < 0.05) between NIL-SS1 and Teqing were indicated with *