Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 6;10(1):e0004315. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004315

Fig 4. Effects of “area” and “environment” on average egg counts.

Fig 4

The difference in average egg counts between the urban and sylvatic environments in the intervention area was half the difference between the environments in the non-intervention area. Note that the average egg numbers represent the mode from the back-transformed coefficients.