Table 3.
Indirect Effects for Cross-sectional Mediation Analyses
Indirect Effect | Total Effect | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(T1) | (T1) | (T1) | Effect Size |
BC Bootstrap CI |
Effect Size |
|
H1a | Exposure | → Talk about ads | → Sought help | .033 | .016 – .051 | .064 |
H1b | Exposure | → Talk about ads | → Tried to quit | .022 | .005 – .040 | .052 |
H2a | Exposure | → Talk about quitting | → Sought help | .024 | .012 – .037 | .057 |
H2b | Exposure | → Talk about quitting | → Tried to quit | .027 | .012 – .042 | .004 |
H3a | Talk about ads | → Talk about quitting | → Sought help | .050 | .034 – .068 | .144 |
H3b | Talk about ads | → Talk about quitting | → Tried to quit | .061 | .044 – .078 | .096 |
Note. N = 2010–3007 (varies across analyses due to missing data on confounders and talk about ads variable). T1 = variable measured at first interview; BC Bootstrap CI = bias-corrected bootstrap confidence intervals. Indirect and total effect sizes are standardized. Non-zero indirect effects are bolded. These analyses report the effects of the compound path from the first named variable to the last named variable through the mediator, adjusting for confounders. Behavioral outcomes occurred within the past month.