Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 30;129:169–180. doi: 10.1007/s00122-015-2620-z

Table 3.

Information about QTL for resistance against Leptosphaeria maculans detected by composite interval mapping in each of five winter oilseed rape field experiments with the BnaDYDH (Darmor-bzh × Yudal) mapping population

LGa Locusb Position (cM)b Support interval (cM) −log (P)c Effect (SE)d R 2 (%)e
INRA95
 A2 E02.1200 89.7 85.9–98.5 8.54 0.18 (0.03) 6.64
 A4 CB10347 4.2 0.0–7.2 4.28 0.12 (0.03) 3.01
 A6 A18.1580 88.5 80.5–110.4 5.51 0.15 (0.03) 4.55
 A7 CB10450 31.3 21.6–39.1 4.82 0.14 (0.03) 2.96
 A8 CB10013b 43.1 28.4–55.8 10.46 0.21 (0.03) 7.47
 A9 W15.1470 124.8 110.3–129.4 6.88 0.18 (0.03) 7.12
 C2 Fad8 17.2 3.4–24.7 8.25 −0.18 (0.03) 7.55
 C4 A09.1000 120.0 115.3–124.0 10.22 0.20 (0.03) 5.63
INRA96
 A6 Bzh 130.0 126.6–133.2 17.47 0.27 (0.03) 24.33
 C2 W11.610 52.5 41.2–57.8 5.02 −0.14 (0.03) 2.59
 C7 Na12A10 123.1 111.0–137.3 5.25 0.15 (0.03) 3.63
 C8 H06.CD1 102.7 95.0–116.7 4.81 0.13 (0.03) 7.59
INRA07
 A1 sN2305a 104.9 102.5–112.0 7.93 0.18 (0.03) 7.69
 A2 sR94102a 5.0 0–21.6 6.18 0.21 (0.04) 4.23
 A3 Na12C07 215.6 200.9–221.3 3.68 −0.13 (0.03) 1.68
 A4 sN2025 28.1 18.7–32.9 21.61 0.35 (0.04) 15.17
 A6 PFM191a 69.0 57.2–76.2 3.91 0.13 (0.03) 1.82
 A7 A08.2340 39.1 36.1–42.5 11.55 0.23 (0.03) 5.24
 A9 ScL12 105.9 104.5–117.2 6.06 0.17 (0.03) 5.24
 C7 Bras014 83.5 68.6–92.8 5.98 0.16 (0.03) 1.51
 C8 CB10449 70.7 61.0–84.2 4.14 0.15 (0.04) 3.20
RRes08
 A2 sR94102a 14.1 5.0–28.8 4.00 0.19 (0.05) 9.16
 A4 FAD3.A 37.6 23.4–48.7 4.39 0.19 (0.05) 12.88
 C1 sN11707a 21.2 3.5–26.8 4.29 −0.19 (0.05) 11.16
RRes09
 A2 ScJ14 103.3 89.7–117.8 4.16 0.21 (0.05) 5.68
 A6 sR12156a 123.3 110.4–133.3 11.73 0.34 (0.05) 24.80

aLG, the linkage groups, are named according to Brassica napus A1–A10 and C1–C9 designations by the Multinational Brassica Genome Project Steering Committee

(http://www.brassica.info/information/lg_assigments.htm)

bThe marker closest to the position of the maximum effect of the QTL

cTest statistic value for QTL

dThe additive effect (standard error given in brackets)

eProportion (%) of the phenotypic variation explained by the QTL