Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 1;2(12):2016–2023. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2015.11.027

Table 4.

Multiple logistic regression analyses predict an association of IAP deficiency with T2DM.

Explanatory variables Logistic coefficients per unit change Odds ratio (95% CI)
Age (yr.) 0.0226 1.023 (0.993–1.054)
Body mass index (BMI, kg/m2) 0.0466 1.048 (0.986–1.114)
Creatinine (mg/dl) − 0.0166 0.983 (0.847–1.142)
Total cholesterol (mg/dl) 0.00183 1.002 (0.984–1.020)
HDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) − 0.0599 0.942 (0.900–0.985)
LDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) 0.0206 1.021 (1.001–1.041)
Triglycerides (mg/dl) 0.00473 1.005 (0.998–1.011)
ALT (U/l) 0.00944 1.009 (0.998–1.021)
Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) − 0.00012 1.000 (0.984–1.016)
Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) − 0.0139 0.986 (0.958–1.015)
FPG (mmol/l) 1.3563 3.882 (2.972–5.070)
IAP (U/g stool) − 0.0145 0.986 (0.978–0.993)

With each U/g decrease in stool IAP level there is a 1.4% increase in the odds of diabetes diagnosis. For example, if there is 25 U/g decrease in IAP level there will be a 35% increased risk of diabetes. Statistics: Proc Logist procedure (SAS) was used for multiple logistic regression analyses determining association between T2DM with independent risk factors including IAP.