Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 7.
Published in final edited form as: Crisis. 2015;36(4):274–280. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000323

Table 2.

Program feedback for the Jason Foundation “A Promise for Tomorrow Program” from focus groups with students who participated

Program feedback from trained students Percent of trained students reporting recommendation
Important material was forgotten since the training, highlighting the need for increased frequency of training 71%
Aspects of the program could be improved 53%
Updated materials would improve knowledge retention 52%
Settings or events in the training materials should be changed to be more relatable 38.7%
Recommend having trainers who are more knowledgeable and interested in suicide prevention 35%
Material was too vague and did not provide concrete direction on how to help a suicidal friend outside of referral information 32%
Trainers/teachers seemed uninterested in providing training 19.4%
The program was too short, offered too infrequently, or the material was covered too quickly 19%
Training would benefit from small group discussions 18.9%*
Warning signs were not explained clearly enough to allow recognition in friends who may be trying to hide problems 13%
Training would benefit from inclusion of role-plays 10.3%*
Training materials should include more ethnically diverse actors 9.7%
Training materials should include younger actors 3.2%

Note. N = 58. All percentages reflect youth who participated in the program, unless otherwise denoted by asterisks.